RE: sciDocument.rtf

From: Glenn Morton (
Date: Sat Jul 06 2002 - 00:57:58 EDT

  • Next message: Jim Eisele: "RE: sciDocument.rtf"

    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: Shuan Rose []
    >Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 11:04 AM
    >To: Glenn Morton
    >Cc: Asa
    >Subject: RE: sciDocument.rtf
    > Well, then, why the disagreement? Whether you want to call it
    >accommodation to pre-scientific views or use of common idioms, clearly we
    >have a scientifically inaccurate description of certain animals. WE should
    >admit this to be so, rather than try to harmonize these statements with
    >modern science. I'd still like some comments on the rest of my post , which
    >involve more substantive issues.

    I don't think I ever did try to harmonize these descriptions. What makes
    you think I did? All I said was that language uses idioms and occasionally
    words to describe things in ways which aren't accurate and at the same time
    thought Gordon's view was a useful one.



    for lots of creation/evolution information
    personal stories of struggle

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 05 2002 - 17:19:28 EDT