RE: sciDocument.rtf

From: Lucy Lear (
Date: Fri Jul 05 2002 - 18:22:56 EDT

  • Next message: Shuan Rose: "RE: Daniel"

    Jim, your god is too small.

    If B below is true, and there are any errors in the Bible, then your god is

    If C is true, then we all should just stand up, turn off our minds, and
    salute Pat Robertson.

    Lucy the Lurker

    >From: "Jim Eisele" <>
    >To: <>
    >CC: <>, <>
    >Subject: RE: sciDocument.rtf
    >Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 17:00:07 -0000
    >Shuan writes
    > >I'd still like some comments on the rest of my post , which
    > >involve more substantive issues.
    >Shuan, please stop trying to relegate the Bible to a human
    >document. I haven't seen you acknowledge ANY responses as
    >explanations to why you are criticizing a straw man.
    >You have a "modern lens" that is ignoring what the Bible
    >authors were trying to say. Let me suggest a proper order for
    >A) God is almighty (you said that yourself)
    >B) Biblical errors reflect on God.
    >C) You may not like this. People who go around demanding
    > explanations for Biblical "errors" are not building anybody
    > up. It would be really nice if we focused on Biblical
    > accuracies!

    Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 05 2002 - 18:58:07 EDT