Thanks for the reply.. Comments in green. Jay
I think scientists en masse are more concerned with evidence than =
who at times only want to win the case. This is because if they win the =
then they get more money.
Contingency work is usually medical and physical science based. =
Therefore, experts provide its major evidence source through records, =
publication, testing and testimony. =20
There is far more rhetoric from lawyers than scientists.
Both clog up the presses.
Although scientists are and were far from blameless ( I can give lots of
examples to support Jay and ones to contradict him)=20
Thankee again. j
I think Jay has a rather
inadequate understanding of science.
I guess I must have wasted a lot of tuition and time. j
One ought to realize that hominoid anatomy etc is one of the more
contentious areas of science and thus more "subjective" in contrast to =
geology and the so-called exact sciences
That is what I said, I thought. I simply am pointing out that some =
scientists refuse to admit the subjective nature of their alleged facts =
in this area where the "through a glass darkly" simile is most apropos. =
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 08 2002 - 18:17:44 EDT