Shuan Rose posted recently:
"... the below referenced article. Do you have any comments on this
tends to show a rather "hard " anti religious bent. Should a prestigious
journal like SA intervene in this way?"
I just read the whole Sci Am article. The answer to #8 is sort of naive and
is, I think, misleading. But other than that I did not find any serious
faults in the article, nor did I see an anti-religious tone. They might well
have said something along the line that they did not mean one, of course.
I did not read the AIG link. My stomach is a little weak today.
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 16 2002 - 16:24:33 EDT