Some of us cant be bothered to refute the Mesopotamian flood. I find it
unconvincing. The whole of Gen 1 -11 is too vague to make a case for any
position. It is not histroy as we normally consider history but there is
some history behind it and written in a certain way. Read some commentaries
I read GF in 1971.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Eisele" <email@example.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 1:09 AM
Subject: The Flood Hoax
> I continue to study YEC/day-age (and even gap!) issues.
> Apparently the flood is a REALLY BIG deal to YECs.
> We already know that it is biblically false.
> We already know that it is scientifically impossible.
> Has anyone actually read the Genesis Flood? It seems like
> a pretty big book. What is actually in it? Has anyone put
> together a "top ten pieces of baloney" list?
> A little extra time on my hands now that no one on the list
> dares refute the Mesopotamian flood :-),
> Jim Eisele
> Genesis in Question
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 26 2002 - 16:01:03 EDT